Clarifying user intentions

I need to ask what the user exactly wants us to do. Should I write an article, correct facts, or maybe expand on something? The instructions suggest asking only when necessary, but here it’s unclear. I could suggest options like a brief match report, correcting the headline, or generating a tweet. I can mention that we might need match details or templates, and provide some caution regarding an apparent mistake about Arsenal and Brentford's historical records. They likely meant that Arsenal hasn't lost at home to Brentford since 1938.Considering match report details

I think the last home loss for Arsenal to Brentford was in 1938, which could support the idea of an 87-year unbeaten home record against them. However, they did lose away in 2021. It seems there might be a typo with "梅里诺," which might have been intended as "马丁内利." It's important to clarify what the user needs, so I should suggest options like correcting the headline, writing a short match report, or generating social media captions. I'll keep it concise and address any ambiguities in my response.Preparing options for the user

I plan to create a tightened, corrected headline version with different options for the user to choose from. I'll ask them to confirm details or provide their desired style. It seems necessary to replace "梅里诺" with "马丁内利" if that was the intent. I'll offer 2-3 headline options, avoiding heavy formatting but incorporating a bullet list for clarity.

Here’s what I’m thinking:

• A quick note about the mistaken player.
• Provide a polished headline.
• Offer a brief summary without exact details.
• Ask what they want to do next: article, social media, poster, or fact check.

Let’s get these options ready!